krtisfranks wrote:
> Wuzzy wrote:
> > How does this one differ from ge'e?
>
> It does not have the elliptical aspect to it. Also, "no particular
> feeling" can sometimes be different from a very active sense of absence
of
> emotion. Sometimes, when one focuses, is undergoing clinical depression
> (which does not mean only constant sadness), is meditating, etc., one
has
> purposefully or otherwise actively banished emotion. It is not "no
> particular feeling", it is the 'feeling' of emotional absence entirely.
>
> I personally object to ge'e being both elliptical and "no particular
> feeling"; those are two distinct meanings to me. This word is related to
> the latter and helps separate them out, but it does not solve that
> problem.


I agree, in the current ma'oste ge'e seems to me to have two different
meanings.

Comment #4: Re: Difference from “ge'e”?

gleki (Sat May 24 19:13:39 2014)

durka42 wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > Wuzzy wrote: > > > How does this one differ from ge'e? > > > > It does not have the elliptical aspect to it. Also, "no particular > > feeling" can sometimes be different from a very active sense of absence > of > > emotion. Sometimes, when one focuses, is undergoing clinical depression > > (which does not mean only constant sadness), is meditating, etc., one > has > > purposefully or otherwise actively banished emotion. It is not "no > > particular feeling", it is the 'feeling' of emotional absence entirely. > > > > I personally object to ge'e being both elliptical and "no particular > > feeling"; those are two distinct meanings to me. This word is related to > > the latter and helps separate them out, but it does not solve that > > problem. > > > I agree, in the current ma'oste ge'e seems to me to have two different > meanings. ge'e is used both as a separate UI and as a UI-modifier acc. to CLL. For the latter I once suggested using na'i instead.

Comment #5: Re: Difference from “ge'e”? Alex Burka (Sat May 24 19:18:32 2014) gleki wrote: > durka42 wrote: > > krtisfranks wrote: > > > Wuzzy wrote: > > > > How does this one differ from ge'e? > > > > > > It does not have the elliptical aspect to it. Also, "no particular > > > feeling" can sometimes be different from a very active sense of > absence > > of > > > emotion. Sometimes, when one focuses, is undergoing clinical > depression > > > (which does not mean only constant sadness), is meditating, etc., one > > has > > > purposefully or otherwise actively banished emotion. It is not "no > > > particular feeling", it is the 'feeling' of emotional absence > entirely. > > > > > > I personally object to ge'e being both elliptical and "no particular > > > feeling"; those are two distinct meanings to me. This word is related > to > > > the latter and helps separate them out, but it does not solve that > > > problem. > > > > > > I agree, in the current ma'oste ge'e seems to me to have two different > > meanings. > > ge'e is used both as a separate UI and as a UI-modifier acc. to CLL. For > the latter I once suggested using na'i instead. .oi cibysmu

Comment #6: Re: Difference from “ge'e”?

Lorenzo Von Matterhorn (Sun May 25 12:47:31 2014)

durka42 wrote: > I agree, in the current ma'oste ge'e seems to me to have two different > meanings. That's because it's a relative of zo'e, which has the same kind of duality.