This word looks off for a lujvo.

It seems to break up in "lac", the hyphen and, oddly, "'inda".

It is clear that "lac" comes from "lacri", but what about "'inda"? This
would imply that "'inda" is a rafsi, which is odd.
Do the Lojban rules permit such a word? What about the "'" character being
a character in a rafsi?

This word can't be a fu'ivla for sure, because "y" is disallowed in
fu'ivla.

Comment #2: Re: What kind of word is this?

Jonathan (Mon Jun 15 14:50:29 2015)

It is valid under a proposal by la xorxes for zi'evla lujvo-formation, and is accepted under both versions of camxes parser.

Comment #4: Re: What kind of word is this? Wuzzy (Mon Jun 15 15:28:27 2015) spheniscine wrote: > It is valid under a proposal by la xorxes for zi'evla lujvo-formation, and > is accepted under both versions of camxes parser. Can you please, for the future, mention this non-standard word formation in the notes or etymology? I don't like to see non-standard words mixed up with standard words, as jbovlaste does not make any sort of difference atm. Comment #5: Re: What kind of word is this? gleki (Mon Jun 15 16:11:26 2015) Wuzzy wrote: > spheniscine wrote: > > It is valid under a proposal by la xorxes for zi'evla lujvo-formation, > and > > is accepted under both versions of camxes parser. > > > Can you please, for the future, mention this non-standard word formation in > the notes or etymology? I don't like to see non-standard words mixed up > with standard words, as jbovlaste does not make any sort of difference atm. http://lojban.github.io/cll/4/16/ Also notes isn't the best place for that. A change in the db model of JVS is needed, at least tagging capabilities for each definition.

Comment #3: Re: What kind of word is this?

Jonathan (Mon Jun 15 14:54:41 2015)

Also, quite obviously, accepted and recognized by JVS.