 Home
 Get A Printable Dictionary
 Search Best Words
 Recent Changes
 How You Can Help
 valsi  All
 valsi  Preferred Only
 natlang  All
 natlang  Preferred Only
 Languages
 XML Export
 user Listing
 Report Bugs
 Utilities
 Status
 Help
 Admin Request
 Create Account

Discussion of "pi'i"
[parent]
[root]
Comment #1:
Overloaded

Curtis W Franks (Mon Aug 4 05:18:19 2014)

Presumably, this operator is overloaded, right? For example, it is typical integer multiplication for integers, scalar multiplication for vectors, and pointwise multiplication for functions; correct? (Modulo context/definitions)


Comment #2:
Re: Overloaded

Curtis W Franks (Tue Nov 10 06:16:24 2015)

krtisfranks wrote: > Presumably, this operator is overloaded, right? For example, it is typical > integer multiplication for integers, scalar multiplication for vectors, > and pointwise multiplication for functions; correct? (Modulo > context/definitions)
And should matrix multiplication (of vectors or matrices as standard ly described) be considered "pi'i"?
In any case, I think that we should have an entrywise/componentwise operator (de)convertion; that is, one which distributes an operator to each term in a tuple (or which can go layers deeper) if valid. This idea is rather like the dot operators in MatLab, "@@" in Mathematica, and relates to vectorization.


Comment #3:
Re: Overloaded

gleki (Tue Nov 10 06:25:31 2015)

krtisfranks wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > Presumably, this operator is overloaded, right? For example, it is > typical > > integer multiplication for integers, scalar multiplication for vectors, > > and pointwise multiplication for functions; correct? (Modulo > > context/definitions) > > > And should matrix multiplication (of vectors or matrices as standard ly > described) be considered "pi'i"? > > In any case, I think that we should have an entrywise/componentwise > operator (de)convertion; that is, one which distributes an operator to each > term in a tuple (or which can go layers deeper) if valid. This idea is > rather like the dot operators in MatLab, "@@" in Mathematica, and relates
> to vectorization.
It's a good idea to map words to less polysemous operators like in MatLab.
P.S. I wish you created more brivla rather than cmavo connectives.


Comment #4:
Re: Overloaded

Curtis W Franks (Thu Nov 12 22:14:38 2015)

gleki wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > krtisfranks wrote: > > > Presumably, this operator is overloaded, right? For example, it is > > typical > > > integer multiplication for integers, scalar multiplication for vectors, > > > and pointwise multiplication for functions; correct? (Modulo > > > context/definitions) > > > > > > And should matrix multiplication (of vectors or matrices as standard ly > > described) be considered "pi'i"? > > > > In any case, I think that we should have an entrywise/componentwise > > operator (de)convertion; that is, one which distributes an operator to > each > > term in a tuple (or which can go layers deeper) if valid. This idea is > > rather like the dot operators in MatLab, "@@" in Mathematica, and relates > > > to vectorization. > > > It's a good idea to map words to less polysemous operators like in MatLab. > > P.S. I wish you created more brivla rather than cmavo connectives.
I agree.
Re: P.S. Unfortunately, that is not really how the language works; mekso operators almost surely should be cmavo. There are a few cases for brivla being useful (such as with .aigne), but those ideas are not really operators. :/






