nu bu, ni bu, ka bu, du'u bu

Please, help me find a better phrasing for these letterals.

They are to be used to refer to the last sumti starting with LE NU that is
complete at the moment of using this letteral.

Comment #2: Re: e'o sidju mi

Alex Burka (Sat Jan 31 17:59:24 2015)

gleki wrote: > nu bu, ni bu, ka bu, du'u bu > > Please, help me find a better phrasing for these letterals. > > They are to be used to refer to the last sumti starting with LE NU that is > complete at the moment of using this letteral. I like them.

Comment #3: Re: e'o sidju mi

Alex Burka (Sat Feb 7 05:29:33 2015)

gleki wrote: > nu bu, ni bu, ka bu, du'u bu > > Please, help me find a better phrasing for these letterals. > > They are to be used to refer to the last sumti starting with LE NU that is > complete at the moment of using this letteral. I added a rephrased English definition, what do you think?

Comment #4: Re: e'o sidju mi gleki (Sat Feb 7 06:40:06 2015) durka42 wrote: > gleki wrote: > > nu bu, ni bu, ka bu, du'u bu > > > > Please, help me find a better phrasing for these letterals. > > > > They are to be used to refer to the last sumti starting with LE NU that > is > > complete at the moment of using this letteral. > > I added a rephrased English definition, what do you think? 1. As cryptic as mine. 2. " sumti that started with a nu-abstraction" is not very true. What about "lo ca ui nu broda". Isn't it "nu bu" as well. But it doesn't start with "nu-abstraction". And sumti can't start with NU in general. They start with LE or are KOhA. Additionally what is "nu-abstraction"? Yet another term never and nowhere explained. Something more verbose is needed imo.