Wuzzy wrote: > Why did you include the material into the definition? > Please note that blikubli does not have a material place, so I do not > understand why vonblikubli has one. vonblikubli and it’s relatives > should parallel the place structure of blikubli as close as possible to > have more regularity. > I have elimited the material place of blikubli for a reason. bliku is > the seltau of the veljvo of blikubli and the material place is clearly a > dependent place of x1. If you know what the x1 is, you also know the x2 > since a bliku can only have one material. The dimensionality place of > kubli, on the other hand, got eliminated as well because bliku > explicitly needs three dimensions. > Please also note that blikubli is very closely related to kubybli. > kubybli is almost the same as blikubli, but it _does_ include a > material place, since this time, it is in the tertau of its veljvo and one > should rarely (at best: never) elide tertau places. So I guess > vonkubybli instead of vonblikubli is what you should have used for the > place structure you chose. Finally, vonblikubli and vonkubybli and > their relatives can peacefully coexist and differ only in wheater they > include a material place or not, suggestion that blikubli may refer to > an abstract regular polyhedron (but being a real-life object is not > explicitly excluded), while a kubybli is an real-life (implied by the > material place) object in the shape of a regular polyhedron. One can think > of kubybli as a specialized form of blikubli, although the current > definitions don’t say that explicitly. But they do it, sort of, > implicitly. Oh, I am following the conventions suggested in the CLL, if > you haven’t noticed yet. > Suggestions summary: > (1) remove the material place from vonblikubli. > (2) if you insist on a material place, take the current definition of > vonblukubli and use it for vonkubybli instead. > (3) suggestions (1) and (2) also apply to all lujvo of a similar shape, > like pavrelblikubli, and so on. > > If nobody protests or reacts within seven days, I do these changes by > myselves.
Ok, I agree. I think I should go back and read CLL even more closely about what has been written about dependent places. I really want to know those things completely, so I don't do any unnecessary mistakes. After all I add a lot of words to jbovlaste imu'ibo mi nelci lo nu go'i. And I don't want my work to mess upp things. So good job of you to correct things when you see them!
|