phma wrote:
> Since I can't add "ka glebre" to the Lojban words, and someone looking
for
> "glebre" or "heat" won't find it if the entry is "ka glebre" or "be in
> heat", I'll leave the gloss words as they are and add a note.

That's okay.

Another issue:
If I'm not mistaken, the "notes" field will end up in the English part of
the dictionary, together with the definition. Therefore, it should be in
English, not in Lojban.

Comment #4: Re: Inappropriately abstracted gloss words

Pierre Abbat (Sun Dec 12 23:30:32 2004)

arj wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, the "notes" field will end up in the English part of > the dictionary, together with the definition. Therefore, it should be in > English, not in Lojban. The notes field of "glebre" ends up in the Lojban-English part. The note about musth is for a jbopli who knows "glebre" but not "musth". Other notes, such as the one at naxle, are for glipli and clarify the meaning of the Lojban word.