totus wrote:
> More reflection. I suggest:
>
> p1 is a second-level administrative division of country p2=g1
>
> Third-level: gugypausle
> p1 is a third-level administrative division of country p2=g1

"Second-level (third-level) administrative sub-division" etc. is fine as a
clarificational note, but as the sole part of a definition it is somewhat
fraught with ambiguity. I think I'll try to add a note to gugypau soon
to that effect.

Re gugypausle: I can't find any google hits on it except in this very
discussion. Where is it from?

Comment #8: Re: Redefinition for gugpau?

Andrew Piekarski (Fri May 15 23:50:06 2009)

arj wrote: > totus wrote: > > More reflection. I suggest: > > > > p1 is a second-level administrative division of country p2=g1 > > > > Third-level: gugypausle > > p1 is a third-level administrative division of country p2=g1 > > "Second-level (third-level) administrative sub-division" etc. is fine as a > clarificational note, but as the sole part of a definition it is somewhat > fraught with ambiguity. I think I'll try to add a note to gugypau soon > to that effect. > > Re gugypausle: I can't find any google hits on it except in this very > discussion. Where is it from? OK! I'll check back with you in a week. As for gugypausle, I'm suggesting a new lujvo for the third-level. Note: A province in Italy or Chile is third-level whereas in Canada it's second-level. Without a third-level definition, an Italian/Chilean province may end up as a gugypau.