- Home
- Get A Printable Dictionary
- Search Best Words
- Recent Changes
- How You Can Help
- valsi - All
- valsi - Preferred Only
- natlang - All
- natlang - Preferred Only
- Languages
- XML Export
- user Listing
- Report Bugs
- Utilities
- Status
- Help
- Admin Request
- Create Account
|
Discussion of "farna"
[parent]
[root]
Comment #1:
Split x4
|
Curtis W Franks (Tue Jun 21 22:39:39 2016)
|
The origin terbri should be separate from the frame of reference terbri (for this word and all other direction words). The destination terbri (x2) and the origin terbri (present x4 in one sense) create a directed line segment such that the direction is x1, but what one calls it is entirely determined by the basis chosen (the frame of reference, a separate sense of present x4). Some of the issues mentioned in my commentary about fargau (see its definition) would technically be resolvable (if not ideal in practice) if we make this correction.
|
-
Comment #2:
Re: Split x3
|
Curtis W Franks (Tue Jun 21 22:41:02 2016)
|
krtisfranks wrote: > The origin terbri should be separate from the frame of reference terbri > (for this word and all other direction words). The destination terbri (x2) > and the origin terbri (present x4 in one sense) create a directed line > segment such that the direction is x1, but what one calls it is entirely > determined by the basis chosen (the frame of reference, a separate sense of > present x4). Some of the issues mentioned in my commentary about fargau
> (see its definition) would technically be resolvable (if not ideal in > practice) if we make this correction.
Oops. Every mention of "x4" should be replaced with "x3". I was thinking "we need an x4" and therefore confused myself.
|
-
|
|
|