- Home
- Get A Printable Dictionary
- Search Best Words
- Recent Changes
- How You Can Help
- valsi - All
- valsi - Preferred Only
- natlang - All
- natlang - Preferred Only
- Languages
- XML Export
- user Listing
- Report Bugs
- Utilities
- Status
- Help
- Admin Request
- Create Account
|
Discussion of "orsi"
[parent]
[root]
Comment #5:
Re: Sequence or Tuple
|
gleki (Sun Feb 7 18:00:28 2016)
|
krtisfranks wrote: > gleki wrote: > > krtisfranks wrote: > > > Your example of rely'orsi makes me think that you want orsi to mean > > > > "tuple" in English. Is this interpretation correct? > > > > > > And I wonder how porsi1 or porsi2 is not "tuple". > > > porsi1 might be and porsi2 along with porsi3 might be enough to specify > which one it is, but it would probably be nice to be able to know/specify
> the terms ("components") explicitly, especially by feeding them in either
> individually or as an ordered list (which makes it get kind of meta, but I > think that that is okay). > And it might be the case the porsi does not work at all. I have been > thinking about this problem for a long time and I oscillate.
So it'd a tuple with explicit probably immutable number of places and with some default unspecified rules of how the order is formed (unimportant, not relevant to physical implementation)?
|
-
Comment #6:
Re: Sequence or Tuple
|
Curtis W Franks (Tue Feb 9 21:29:56 2016)
|
gleki wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > gleki wrote: > > > krtisfranks wrote: > > > > Your example of rely'orsi makes me think that you want orsi to > mean > > > > > > "tuple" in English. Is this interpretation correct? > > > > > > > > > And I wonder how porsi1 or porsi2 is not "tuple". > > > > > > porsi1 might be and porsi2 along with porsi3 might be enough to specify
> > which one it is, but it would probably be nice to be able to know/specify > > > the terms ("components") explicitly, especially by feeding them in either > > > individually or as an ordered list (which makes it get kind of meta, but > I > > think that that is okay). > > And it might be the case the porsi does not work at all. I have been > > thinking about this problem for a long time and I oscillate. > > > So it'd a tuple with explicit probably immutable number of places and with > some default unspecified rules of how the order is formed (unimportant, not > relevant to physical implementation)?
I presently think so.
|
-
|
|
|