lakanro wrote:
> it's so bad


but luckily it seems to be downvoted by the author 'emselves.

Comment #3: Re: why timne has the same four-letter rafsi

Curtis W Franks (Sun Sep 24 22:25:09 2017)

gleki wrote: > lakanro wrote: > > it's so bad > > > but luckily it seems to be downvoted by the author 'emselves. Also luckily: The words are the same. I am of the opinion that any two gismu which are in similarity conflict with one another (under the condition that the conflict does not involve the letters "b", "p", "f", or "v" or - separately - "z", "s", "c", or "j"!) are the same word for all purposes whatsoever except the assignment of short rafsi (which preferences the canonical form) and a few other technical details, and thus must have exactly the same (essentially singular) meaning. This pair satisfy these properties and none of the exceptions apply, so we are all good.

Comment #4: Re: why timne has the same four-letter rafsi Wang Jian (Sat Sep 30 06:34:36 2017) krtisfranks wrote: > gleki wrote: > > lakanro wrote: > > > it's so bad > > > > > > but luckily it seems to be downvoted by the author 'emselves. > > Also luckily: The words are the same. I am of the opinion that any two > gismu which are in similarity conflict with one another (under the > condition that the conflict does not involve the letters "b", "p", "f", or > "v" or - separately - "z", "s", "c", or "j"!) are the same word for all > purposes whatsoever except the assignment of short rafsi (which preferences > the canonical form) and a few other technical details, and thus must have > exactly the same (essentially singular) meaning. This pair satisfy these > properties and none of the exceptions apply, so we are all good. i don't think so,they are so difficult, we can only choose one of them. Comment #5: Re: why timne has the same four-letter rafsi Wang Jian (Sat Sep 30 06:36:01 2017) lakanro wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > gleki wrote: > > > lakanro wrote: > > > > it's so bad > > > > > > > > > but luckily it seems to be downvoted by the author 'emselves. > > > > Also luckily: The words are the same. I am of the opinion that any two > > gismu which are in similarity conflict with one another (under the > > condition that the conflict does not involve the letters "b", "p", "f", > or > > "v" or - separately - "z", "s", "c", or "j"!) are the same word for all > > purposes whatsoever except the assignment of short rafsi (which > preferences > > the canonical form) and a few other technical details, and thus must have > > > exactly the same (essentially singular) meaning. This pair satisfy these > > properties and none of the exceptions apply, so we are all good. > > i don't think so,they are so difficult, we can only choose one of them. not "difficult", it's "different" Comment #6: Re: why timne has the same four-letter rafsi Curtis W Franks (Sun Oct 1 00:19:14 2017) lakanro wrote: > > i don't think so,they are so difficult, we can only choose one of them. > > > not "difficult", it's "different" Oh, for some reason, when I looked last time, both terms pulled up the same page. But now, when I do it, I see that they are in fact different. So, everything that I said is totally wrong and should be ignored; you are right.