- Home
- Get A Printable Dictionary
- Search Best Words
- Recent Changes
- How You Can Help
- valsi - All
- valsi - Preferred Only
- natlang - All
- natlang - Preferred Only
- Languages
- XML Export
- user Listing
- Report Bugs
- Utilities
- Status
- Help
- Admin Request
- Create Account
|
Discussion of "xo'u"
[parent]
[root]
|
Comment #10:
Re: Aspect scheme
|
|
gleki (Mon Aug 10 07:39:43 2015)
|
|
cogas wrote:\%\%\%> gleki wrote:\%\%\%> > cogas wrote:\%\%\%> > > gleki wrote:\%\%\%> > > > cogas wrote:\%\%\%> > > > > See: \%\%\%> > > > > \%\%\%> > > > \%\%\%> > > \%\%\%> > \%\%\%> \%\%\%http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9PSNpsZoVHY/VcRLXSRZemI/AAAAAAAAAsQ/J0injdTtMBs/s\%\%\%> > > > > 1600/romai.png\%\%\%> > > > > \%\%\%> > > > > xa'o indicates the point "natural beginning point".\%\%\%> > > > \%\%\%> > > > \%\%\%> > > > Look at the last table: \%\%\%> > > > http://mw.lojban.org/papri/Stub:_Grammatical_aspects\%\%\%> > > > \%\%\%> > > > mo'u is the opposite of co'a.\%\%\%> > > \%\%\%> > > Is the view official? If so, I will accept and I also think that \%\%\%xo'u\%\%\%> \%\%\%> > is \%\%\%> > > not needed.\%\%\%> > \%\%\%> > I have no clue who can give you official view. You may either ask \%\%\%lojbab \%\%\%> or\%\%\%> > BPFK (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/bpfk-list)\%\%\%> \%\%\%> OK. well, I'll change a question. Does many lojbanists accept the view \%\%\%that\%\%\%> mo'u is the opposite of co'a? Or, is the article a mere proposal?\%\%\%\%\%\%a letter to BPFK needed.\%\%\%
|
-
|
Comment #11:
Re: Aspect scheme
|
|
Shotaro (Mon Aug 10 07:42:30 2015)
|
|
gleki wrote:\%\%\%> cogas wrote:\%\%\%> > gleki wrote:\%\%\%> > > cogas wrote:\%\%\%> > > > gleki wrote:\%\%\%> > > > > cogas wrote:\%\%\%> > > > > > See: \%\%\%> > > > > > \%\%\%> > > > > \%\%\%> > > > \%\%\%> > > \%\%\%> > \%\%\%> \%\%\%http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9PSNpsZoVHY/VcRLXSRZemI/AAAAAAAAAsQ/J0injdTtMBs/s\%\%\%> > > > > > 1600/romai.png\%\%\%> > > > > > \%\%\%> > > > > > xa'o indicates the point "natural beginning point".\%\%\%> > > > > \%\%\%> > > > > \%\%\%> > > > > Look at the last table: \%\%\%> > > > > http://mw.lojban.org/papri/Stub:_Grammatical_aspects\%\%\%> > > > > \%\%\%> > > > > mo'u is the opposite of co'a.\%\%\%> > > > \%\%\%> > > > Is the view official? If so, I will accept and I also think that \%\%\%> xo'u\%\%\%> > \%\%\%> > > is \%\%\%> > > > not needed.\%\%\%> > > \%\%\%> > > I have no clue who can give you official view. You may either ask \%\%\%> lojbab \%\%\%> > or\%\%\%> > > BPFK (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/bpfk-list)\%\%\%> > \%\%\%> > OK. well, I'll change a question. Does many lojbanists accept the view \%\%\%> that\%\%\%> > mo'u is the opposite of co'a? Or, is the article a mere proposal?\%\%\%> \%\%\%> a letter to BPFK needed.\%\%\%\%\%\%je'e ki'e gleki\%\%\%
|
-
|
|
|