- Home
- Get A Printable Dictionary
- Search Best Words
- Recent Changes
- How You Can Help
- valsi - All
- valsi - Preferred Only
- natlang - All
- natlang - Preferred Only
- Languages
- XML Export
- user Listing
- Report Bugs
- Utilities
- Status
- Help
- Admin Request
- Create Account
|
Discussion of "ermenefti"
[parent]
[root]
Comment #4:
Re: Result/interpretation terbri
|
gleki (Tue Sep 27 06:26:04 2016)
|
krtisfranks wrote: > gleki wrote: > > krtisfranks wrote: > > > Why not have a terbri for what the result of the analysis is? > > > > > > have in mind any semantic frames in gimste similar to the one you desire? > > In a way, it is somewhat close to lijda3: "sharing common > beliefs/practices/tenets including x3". The only this is that there is no > sharing. It is just the 'belief' (meaning "interpretation") that is > specific. > > It is also almost exactly backward in terbri structure from smuni. So, it > would follow "se te se te se smuni" (there is probably a better way by > which to say that).
smuni is more frequent than lijda. So maybe a new word:
x1 is exegesis (an explanation or critical interpretation) of text/book/object x2 done by x3; x1/x2 is exegetical; x3 are exegetes?
|
-
Comment #5:
Re: Result/interpretation terbri
|
Curtis W Franks (Tue Sep 27 18:28:16 2016)
|
gleki wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > gleki wrote: > > > krtisfranks wrote: > > > > Why not have a terbri for what the result of the analysis is? > > > > > > > > > have in mind any semantic frames in gimste similar to the one you > desire? > > > > In a way, it is somewhat close to lijda3: "sharing common > > beliefs/practices/tenets including x3". The only this is that there is
> no > > sharing. It is just the 'belief' (meaning "interpretation") that is > > specific. > > > > It is also almost exactly backward in terbri structure from smuni. So, > it > > would follow "se te se te se smuni" (there is probably a better way by > > which to say that). > > smuni is more frequent than lijda. So maybe a new word: > > x1 is exegesis (an explanation or critical interpretation) of > text/book/object x2 done by x3; x1/x2 is exegetical; x3 are exegetes?
I am fine with that if you are. Does it break anything? I would include the current definition too, with relabelles terbri.
|
-
|
|
|