Wuzzy wrote:
> Ilmen wrote:
> > What's wrong with this lujvo? Why has it been downvoted?
> Nothing is wrong with the lujvo and it hasn’t been downvoted.
>
> It’s the definition (the seljvo) I don’t like / grasp.
> I don’t know how to even theoretically use this term properly because
of
> the low quality of the definition.
>
> The definition is too vague to me.
> The concept of the “intensity of an event” is unclear to me.
> I don’t know what the x2 is for.


Usage examples showing why we need this word are needed.

In fact usage examples should be made a rule for every new word added.

Comment #5: Re: What's wrong?

Ilmen (Wed Nov 5 14:49:50 2014)

gleki wrote: > Usage examples showing why we need this word are needed. > > In fact usage examples should be made a rule for every new word added. Example added.