Wuzzy wrote:
> krtisfranks wrote:
> > Why not "(c)lutrinai"
>
> Because
> “lutrinai” = “lu trinai” = “lu trina zei natmi” and
> “clutrinai” = “culno zei trina zei natmi”.

Latin name is "lutra", a gimvla u'i.
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Family: Mustelidae
Subfamily: Lutrinae

It just occurred to me that we don't have them in the dict.
.animalias., xordata, mamalias, karnivora, mustlida ?
This mixing cmevla and non-cmevla would be an arbitrary choice. Where is
the border when we need to stop cmevla-izing taxons?
The quickest answer is that everything below species is definitely a cmene
(jutsi2).
Should we map class Mammalia to mabru and Animalia to danlu?

Comment #6: Re: Word choice

Curtis W Franks (Thu Feb 13 07:38:22 2014)

> Should we map class Mammalia to mabru and Animalia to danlu? I vote yay. Likewise for Plantae, Fungi, etc. Do not forget the domains of Eukaryota, Bacteria, Archaea (arxaia?), and the superdomain of the latter two (prokaryota?)! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-domain_system

Comment #7: Re: Word choice gleki (Thu Feb 13 08:04:39 2014) krtisfranks wrote: > > Should we map class Mammalia to mabru and Animalia to danlu? > > I vote yay. Likewise for Plantae, Fungi, etc. danlu is not glossed as Animalia. It can be even bacteria imo. Probably I'll avoid mapping the practicists' taxonomy onto the biological one. I think I'll agree with mabru. > > Do not forget the domains of Eukaryota, Bacteria, Archaea (arxaia?), and > the superdomain of the latter two (prokaryota?)! > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-domain_system arxaia, e'ukariotas (efkaria?), prokariota, nalskami u'i vidru. And Super-Empire Life :)