vpbroman wrote:
> Even if we could create a gismu for bless, to replace the clumsy
to'edapma
> (ugh), it still would not help express cases where the fate imposed is
> mixed instead of all good or all bad. I think xagdapma or zandapma versus

> xladapma or maldapma are good for bless and curse. The general case could

> be like:
> x1 imposes or calls on a greater power to impose on x2 fate/destiny x3.

Definition #66163 is something like that.

> Note: since cursing is much common than blessing, that is the default
when
> unspecified by x3 or a compound.