 Home
 Get A Printable Dictionary
 Search Best Words
 Recent Changes
 How You Can Help
 valsi  All
 valsi  Preferred Only
 natlang  All
 natlang  Preferred Only
 Languages
 XML Export
 user Listing
 Report Bugs
 Utilities
 Status
 Help
 Admin Request
 Create Account

Discussion of "vlakemlerpoi"
[parent]
[root]
Comment #3:
Re: Mathematics

Wuzzy (Mon Jan 13 09:12:50 2014)

filipos wrote: > I would use plain lerpoi (the definition I entered, by tsani), with > lerpoi1 being the sequence of generators and lerpoi3 being their value. > > I guess you could alternatively use valsi (or a lujvo based on it) as > > "x1 is a sequence of generators with value x2 in group presentation x3", No, no, no, NO! That’s WAY too far off from the original definitions. Those definitions certainly would need new words.


Comment #4:
Re: Mathematics

Felipe Gonalves Assis (Mon Jan 13 22:35:00 2014)

Wuzzy wrote: > filipos wrote: > > I guess you could alternatively use valsi (or a lujvo based on it) as > > > > "x1 is a sequence of generators with value x2 in group presentation x3", > No, no, no, NO! > That’s WAY too far off from the original definitions. > Those definitions certainly would need new words.
Ok, this is more for fun than for the original point, but here is a PEG for the Klein group
I < e I  a A  b B  c C  eps A < e A  a I  b C  c B B < e B  a C  b I  c A C < e C  a B  b A  c I
More trivially, it is straightforward to define an attribute grammar for computing the product of a sequence of elements.
So, we do have words (the sequences), interpretations for these words (the values) and rules for how to determine the meaning of a composition of them from its parts (the group operation).


Comment #5:
Re: Mathematics

Curtis W Franks (Tue Jan 14 07:29:34 2014)

filipos wrote: > Wuzzy wrote: > > filipos wrote: > > > I guess you could alternatively use valsi (or a lujvo based on it) > as > > > > > > "x1 is a sequence of generators with value x2 in group presentation > x3", > > No, no, no, NO! > > That’s WAY too far off from the original definitions. > > Those definitions certainly would need new words. > > Ok, this is more for fun than for the original point, but here is a PEG > for the Klein group > > I < e I  a A  b B  c C  eps > A < e A  a I  b C  c B > B < e B  a C  b I  c A > C < e C  a B  b A  c I > > More trivially, it is straightforward to define an attribute grammar for > computing the product of a sequence of elements. > > So, we do have words (the sequences), interpretations for these words (the > values) and rules for how to determine the meaning of a composition of > them from its parts (the group operation).
That is what I was thinking. One could always tack on a seltau indicating 'math'ness on some level.





