krtisfranks wrote:
> Wuzzy wrote:
> > “Forget that (all)” etc. is already done, and much more precise,
> with
> > “si”, “sa” and “su”.
>
> This is a discursive (perhaps tangentially tinged with emotion) not a
> command that manipulates composition of utterances. The English is a
poor
> substitute, I admit.
Then I really don’t see what you actually wanted to say.

>
> > For “continuing (on) in that line of thought/discussion” we have
> > ta'onai.
>
> ta'onai is "returning to the main topic". That is quite different in
> meaning from "continuing in that line", even without the coloration of
the
> latter to be despite the utterer's better judgment.
Then I really don’t see what you actually wanted to say. Again. XD

I think the definition has to be rewritten so even I can understand it. XD