jbovlaste
a lojban dictionary editing system
User:
Pass:

Home
Get A Printable Dictionary
Search Best Words
Recent Changes
How You Can Help
valsi - All
valsi - Preferred Only
natlang - All
natlang - Preferred Only
Languages
XML Export
user Listing
Report Bugs
Utilities
Status
Help
Admin Request
Create Account
Discussion of "xei"

Comment #1: Not needed
Wuzzy (Fri Jul 12 14:13:00 2013)

The fact that this experimental cmavo even exists suggest that the author
most likely misunderstood Lojban’s phonology. rei does not
neccessarily sound like re. Lojban allows two sounds for “e”: (IPA
notation follows) [e] and [ɛ]. So re can be pronounced as [rɛ] or as
[re] (let’s ignore the rhotic (‘r’) sounds now). rei, on the other
hand, must be pronounced [rɛj] (but the Reference Grammar suggests that
[rej] may also be O.K.). If you speak [rɛj] and then [rɛ] out loudly,
you can easily distingush them, so I suggest saying [rɛ] for re and
[rɛj] for rei. This is perfectly legal according to the reference
grammar and does not require to change _anything_ of the language. I urge
you to read the Reference Grammar, chapter 3: sections 2 and 4. See also
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-mid_front_unrounded_vowel>,
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-mid_front_unrounded_vowel> and
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatal_approximant> for the pronouncation
of [e], [ɛ], and [j] respectively.

Comment #2: IPA notation broken
Wuzzy (Fri Jul 12 14:15:10 2013)

Sigh. The parser broke the IPA notation of my previous post. Please
imagine there were brackets (“[” and “]”) around the “spoken”
letters. These are NOT links!

Comment #3: Re: Not needed
gleki (Fri Jul 12 17:33:03 2013)

Wuzzy wrote:
> The fact that this experimental cmavo even exists suggest that the
author
> most likely misunderstood Lojban’s phonology. rei does not
> neccessarily sound like re. Lojban allows two sounds for “e”: (IPA
> notation follows) [e] and [ɛ]. So re can be pronounced as [rɛ] or as
> [re] (let’s ignore the rhotic (‘r’) sounds now). rei, on the
other
> hand, must be pronounced [rɛj] (but the Reference Grammar suggests that
> [rej] may also be O.K.). If you speak [rɛj] and then [rɛ] out loudly,
> you can easily distingush them, so I suggest saying [rɛ] for re and
> [rɛj] for rei. This is perfectly legal according to the reference
> grammar and does not require to change _anything_ of the language. I
urge
> you to read the Reference Grammar, chapter 3: sections 2 and 4. See also
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-mid_front_unrounded_vowel>,
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-mid_front_unrounded_vowel> and
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatal_approximant> for the
pronouncation
> of [e], [ɛ], and [j] respectively.


This is legal but if one says [li pareno li parejno]
or [li parɛno li parɛjno] then the problem still exists.
Numbers (as CLL states) were chosen so that they differ much in
pronunciation. Look at this:
no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so

No two cmavo alike.
rei breaks this and therefore must die.

Comment #4: Not not needed.
Wuzzy (Sat Jul 13 09:43:48 2013)

gleki wrote:
> This is legal but if one says [li pareno li parejno]
> or [li parɛno li parɛjno] then the problem still exists.
Whoops! I did not think about this. *sigh*
[li pareno li parejno] is indeed hard distinguishable (But I find [li
parɛno li parɛjno] much easier to distinguish btw.) and it would not
against the grammar to say so. Whoops! So it seems that rei was indeed a
bad choice. Now I agree that it needs to change.

I just turned my thumb around.

Currently, jbovlaste will accept data for 70 languages.
You are not logged in.

  recent changes jbovlaste main
This is jbovlaste, the lojban dictionary system.
The main code was last changed on Wed 07 Oct 2020 05:54:55 PM PDT.
All content is public domain. By submitting content, you agree to place it in the public domain to the fullest extent allowed by local law.
jbovlaste is an official project of the logical language group, and is now headed by Robin Lee Powell.
E-mail him if you have any questions.
care to log in?