I begin to question this definition. I am not sure if it was a good idea
to keep p2 and p3, since they don’t really apply to the concept of a
string.
If anyone could think of a meaningful usage and posts an example, that
would help.
If not, I should post a definition which drops p2 and p3.
Please say what you think of this definition.

Comment #2: Re: Request for comments

Curtis W Franks (Tue Jan 14 07:37:20 2014)

Wuzzy wrote: > I begin to question this definition. I am not sure if it was a good idea > to keep p2 and p3, since they don’t really apply to the concept of a > string. > If anyone could think of a meaningful usage and posts an example, that > would help. > If not, I should post a definition which drops p2 and p3. > Please say what you think of this definition. I do not really understand what p3 would be doing there, and p2 seems to me to be simply "the rule of spelling the 'word'/text string that I intend" (in the sense where "word" does not denote any meaning or value). I too am interested in examples of the utility of these terbri.