pls discuss

Comment #2: Re: VUhU?

Curtis W Franks (Sat Jun 27 15:43:58 2015)

gleki wrote: > pls discuss My main issue is that it is a somewhat abnormal operator for Lojban at the moment in that it explicitly produces only a string of digits which must later be interpreted as/converted to a number if necessary. In particular, the output attaches as digits to surrounding strings if digits before they are converted into numbers. On the other hand, I do not see why the type of output of an operator should dictate its selma'o; this word operates on one number in order to form an output in mekso- that seems like an unary operator in VUhU to me.