- Home
- Get A Printable Dictionary
- Search Best Words
- Recent Changes
- How You Can Help
- valsi - All
- valsi - Preferred Only
- natlang - All
- natlang - Preferred Only
- Languages
- XML Export
- user Listing
- Report Bugs
- Utilities
- Status
- Help
- Admin Request
- Create Account
|
Discussion of "dolmeni"
[parent]
[root]
Comment #2:
Re: x2, x3, ..?
|
gleki (Sat Jan 25 05:41:19 2014)
|
krtisfranks wrote: > Why no mention of structure, constituents, or contents?
With just additional clauses lo dolmeni poi dinju ko'a gi'e se nenri ko'e ...?
|
-
Comment #3:
Re: x2, x3, ..?
|
Curtis W Franks (Sat Jan 25 05:58:58 2014)
|
gleki wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > Why no mention of structure, constituents, or contents? > > > With just additional clauses lo dolmeni poi dinju ko'a gi'e se nenri ko'e > ...?
Sure, they can be added. I am not an archaeologist/expert, but I was thinking that such matters might be more innate to the concept of a dolmen than peripheral things that can be tacked on. Maybe they are not all that pertinent. I was just raising the point that the referent of dolmeni might be a more complicated thing/relationship.
|
-
Comment #4:
Re: x2, x3, ..?
|
gleki (Sat Jan 25 06:08:50 2014)
|
krtisfranks wrote: > gleki wrote: > > krtisfranks wrote: > > > Why no mention of structure, constituents, or contents? > > > > > > With just additional clauses lo dolmeni poi dinju ko'a gi'e se nenri > ko'e > > ...? > > > Sure, they can be added. I am not an archaeologist/expert, but I was > thinking that such matters might be more innate to the concept of a dolmen > than peripheral things that can be tacked on. Maybe they are not all that > pertinent. I was just raising the point that the referent of dolmeni > might be a more complicated thing/relationship.
Just like many don't like new gismu/fu'ivla I don't like duplicating same sumti places over and over again.
|
-
Comment #5:
Re: x2, x3, ..?
|
Curtis W Franks (Sat Jan 25 06:50:52 2014)
|
gleki wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > gleki wrote: > > > krtisfranks wrote: > > > > Why no mention of structure, constituents, or contents? > > > > > > > > > With just additional clauses lo dolmeni poi dinju ko'a gi'e se nenri > > ko'e > > > ...? > > > > > > Sure, they can be added. I am not an archaeologist/expert, but I was > > thinking that such matters might be more innate to the concept of a > dolmen > > than peripheral things that can be tacked on. Maybe they are not all > that > > pertinent. I was just raising the point that the referent of dolmeni > > might be a more complicated thing/relationship. > > Just like many don't like new gismu/fu'ivla I don't like duplicating same > sumti places over and over again.
Ah, okey dokey. No worries then. :)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|