jbovlaste
a lojban dictionary editing system
User:
Pass:

Home
Get A Printable Dictionary
Search Best Words
Recent Changes
How You Can Help
valsi - All
valsi - Preferred Only
natlang - All
natlang - Preferred Only
Languages
XML Export
user Listing
Report Bugs
Utilities
Status
Help
Admin Request
Create Account
Discussion of "relfu'ivla"

Comment #1: Some notes
Curtis W Franks (Mon Jan 13 06:11:35 2014)

The example is missing.

I typically would prefer something like relraukemfu'ivla or
reltcitykemfu'ivla, since these decompose in a more logically intuitive
way for me (and the grouping is correct, not to mention that it gives some
sense of exactly what 2 has to do with it all). However, I figure that
people will eventually adopt this word as the standard. Given that
leeway, if there was one thing that I would like, it would be that the
grouping was made explicitly to be 2+fu'ivla: relkemfu'ivla.

Even though the syntax is wrong, I actually kind of suspect that a
contemporary (to the current culture) Lojban speaker will interpret
fu'ivla to be the basic word, which has "two-" tacked onto it, rather
than understanding it as a relfu'i valsi (whatever that is).

Comment #2: Re: Some notes
Wuzzy (Mon Jan 13 08:57:13 2014)

krtisfranks wrote:
> The example is missing.
This is not true.

> I typically would prefer something like relraukemfu'ivla or
> reltcitykemfu'ivla, since these decompose in a more logically
intuitive
> way for me (and the grouping is correct, not to mention that it gives
some
> sense of exactly what 2 has to do with it all). However, I figure that
> people will eventually adopt this word as the standard. Given that
> leeway, if there was one thing that I would like, it would be that the
> grouping was made explicitly to be 2+fu'ivla: relkemfu'ivla.
Feel free to write synonymous definitions. Those could peacefully co-exist
with “relfu'ivla”. Nobody is hindering you.

> Even though the syntax is wrong, I actually kind of suspect that a
> contemporary (to the current culture) Lojban speaker will interpret
> fu'ivla to be the basic word, which has "two-" tacked onto it, rather
> than understanding it as a relfu'i valsi (whatever that is).
Well, dropping a “ke” is common practice and also officially endorsed
by the Reference Grammar.

The main motivation behind dropping some rafsi is for shortness. Dropping
a “ke” is done if one doesn’t think the other possible
interpretations make sense.

I also explicitly marked all 4 words as jargon.

Comment #3: Re: Some notes
Curtis W Franks (Tue Jan 14 07:34:19 2014)

Wuzzy wrote:
> krtisfranks wrote:
> > The example is missing.
> This is not true.
>
> > I typically would prefer something like relraukemfu'ivla or
> > reltcitykemfu'ivla, since these decompose in a more logically
> intuitive
> > way for me (and the grouping is correct, not to mention that it gives
> some
> > sense of exactly what 2 has to do with it all). However, I figure
that
> > people will eventually adopt this word as the standard. Given that
> > leeway, if there was one thing that I would like, it would be that the
> > grouping was made explicitly to be 2+fu'ivla: relkemfu'ivla.
> Feel free to write synonymous definitions. Those could peacefully
co-exist
> with “relfu'ivla”. Nobody is hindering you.
>
> > Even though the syntax is wrong, I actually kind of suspect that a
> > contemporary (to the current culture) Lojban speaker will interpret
> > fu'ivla to be the basic word, which has "two-" tacked onto it,
rather
> > than understanding it as a relfu'i valsi (whatever that is).
> Well, dropping a “ke” is common practice and also officially
endorsed
> by the Reference Grammar.
>
> The main motivation behind dropping some rafsi is for shortness.
Dropping
> a “ke” is done if one doesn’t think the other possible
> interpretations make sense.
>
> I also explicitly marked all 4 words as jargon.


I am not hating on the word! That is why I said "Some notes", rather than
"Opposing arguments", lol. I certainly believe in synonyms. But I am not
really sure that there is much worth in establishing them, since (as you
pointed out) there is little room for confusion, the word and concept are
both jargon-ish, and Zipf will reduce their length anyway. I will hold
off on that for now. I just wanted to put some commentary out there.

(I still do not see the examples, but I now suspect that it is just me.)

Comment #4: Re: Some notes
Wuzzy (Tue Jan 14 14:22:34 2014)

> (I still do not see the examples, but I now suspect that it is just me.)


The example is on the top of the page, rather than part of the definition.

Currently, jbovlaste will accept data for 70 languages.
You are not logged in.

  recent changes jbovlaste main
This is jbovlaste, the lojban dictionary system.
The main code was last changed on Wed 07 Oct 2020 05:54:55 PM PDT.
All content is public domain. By submitting content, you agree to place it in the public domain to the fullest extent allowed by local law.
jbovlaste is an official project of the logical language group, and is now headed by Robin Lee Powell.
E-mail him if you have any questions.
care to log in?