- Home
- Get A Printable Dictionary
- Search Best Words
- Recent Changes
- How You Can Help
- valsi - All
- valsi - Preferred Only
- natlang - All
- natlang - Preferred Only
- Languages
- XML Export
- user Listing
- Report Bugs
- Utilities
- Status
- Help
- Admin Request
- Create Account
|
Discussion of "vipsi"
Comment #1:
Organization terbri
|
Curtis W Franks (Tue Dec 6 08:11:10 2016)
|
We maybe should add a terbri for specifically which organization/system to which the deputy belongs. The second terbri describes their role in that structure or the generic form of the structure, and the third describes the person who fills the role above them, but that structure itself is never actually given the opportunity to be specified. Moreover, there is an asymmetry between this word and my new proposal of premi, which (I think) really needs this proposed terbri.
|
-
Comment #2:
Re: Organization terbri
|
gleki (Tue Dec 6 13:39:13 2016)
|
krtisfranks wrote: > We maybe should add a terbri for specifically which organization/system to > which the deputy belongs. The second terbri describes their role in that > structure or the generic form of the structure, and the third describes the > person who fills the role above them, but that structure itself is never > actually given the opportunity to be specified. Moreover, there is an > asymmetry between this word and my new proposal of premi, which (I think) > really needs this proposed terbri.
What is more basti has "circumstances" terbricmi which may be parallel to your "organization" one but ... basti lacks vipsi2 counterpart (replace in which aspect?)
|
-
Comment #3:
Re: Organization terbri
|
Curtis W Franks (Tue Dec 6 17:36:11 2016)
|
gleki wrote: > krtisfranks wrote: > > We maybe should add a terbri for specifically which organization/system
> to > > which the deputy belongs. The second terbri describes their role in that > > structure or the generic form of the structure, and the third describes
> the > > person who fills the role above them, but that structure itself is never > > actually given the opportunity to be specified. Moreover, there is an > > asymmetry between this word and my new proposal of premi, which (I > think) > > really needs this proposed terbri. > > > What is more basti has "circumstances" terbricmi which may be parallel to > your "organization" one but ... basti lacks vipsi2 counterpart (replace
> in which aspect?)
I agree. Replacements are not universal. If someone dies then they can be replaced at their job and, separately, in their marriage; normally, one replacing person cannot fill both roles.
|
-
|
|
|
|