- Home
- Get A Printable Dictionary
- Search Best Words
- Recent Changes
- How You Can Help
- valsi - All
- valsi - Preferred Only
- natlang - All
- natlang - Preferred Only
- Languages
- XML Export
- user Listing
- Report Bugs
- Utilities
- Status
- Help
- Admin Request
- Create Account
|
Discussion of "smela"
Comment #1:
Discussion page
|
najrut (Sat Apr 16 10:21:31 2011)
|
Discussion page. http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=experimental+gismu
|
-
|
Comment #2:
Why gismu for this?
|
Andrew Piekarski (Sat Apr 16 12:34:02 2011)
|
It seems to me that if we were to have experimental gismu, they should follow tha same rules as applied to the creation of the standard gismu: i.e. either for really basic words, or for commonly-used words. "Peach tree" hardly fits into either category!
|
-
Comment #3:
Re: Why gismu for this?
|
najrut (Sun Apr 17 12:10:37 2011)
|
There is a discussion page where there it's suggested that there could be such gismu (by Adam and phma).
I guess that genus Prunus is as important as plise or perli. And I want to create similar definition. I really don't know whether it should be "tree" or "fruit" plise is defined as x1 is an apple [fruit] of species/strain x2. perli as x1 is a pear [fruit] of species/strain x2.
So as these definitions are about fruits then "smela" should also be fruit.
I agree if you want to change to "x1 is a plum/peach/cherry/apricot/almond/sloe [fruit] (genus Prunus) of species/variety x2"
Please reply. totus wrote: > It seems to me that if we were to have experimental gismu, they should > follow tha same rules as applied to the creation of the standard gismu: > i.e. either for really basic words, or for commonly-used words. "Peach > tree" hardly fits into either category!
|
-
|
|
|